The Issue: Ex-First Lady Jill Biden’s hard-to-believe claims about Joe’s health in her new memoir.
Former First Lady Jill Biden knew her husband was feeble long before the debate took place (“Joe ‘ailing’ pre-debate, Jill writes,” June 3).
The administration still held out for weeks before “Sleepy Joe” finally dropped out, leaving his party with an even worse candidate. For shame.
I did not vote for President Trump the first two times — which I regret — but I think I’m going to miss him come 2029.
Harold Francis
Colonial Heights, Va.
I do not know why people are picking on Jill Biden. By having her husband finish his term of office, she saved us from Vice President Kamala Harris becoming president of the United States.
Joel M. Glazer
Elizabeth, NJ
There’s a lot to take away from Jill Biden’s exposé — chiefly that everyone who called us crazy for saying Joe Biden wasn’t running the country and hid that fact from the American people owes us an apology.
But they owe us a lot of apologies for calling people that disagree with them racists, pedophiles and fascists — apologies that will never come, because the Trump-deranged are petty, dishonest and brainwashed political zombies.
Nick McNulty
Windham, NH
If I saw my wife have what appeared to be a stroke during a public-speaking event, I would insist that she get medical testing to see if it really was a stroke.
If Jill Biden failed to do the same after the debate, her devotion to her husband’s political desires overrode her obligations to his health. Her initial instinct may very well have been right, but her priorities were horribly screwed up.
Michael O’Connor
Manhattan
The truth always comes out in the end. The lies and massive coverup of President Joe Biden’s cognitive health merely delayed the inevitable.
We are now nearly two years past the infamous debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump.
Being in “coverup mode,” Jill Biden never would have admitted her immediate reaction that she thought her husband was having a stroke at the time, when it was headline news. What we are now witnessing are “trickle-down truisms.”
JoAnn Lee Frank
Clearwater, Fla.
The Issue: Mayor Mamdani’s desire to remove Ed Koch’s name from the 59th Street Bridge.
Mayor Mamdani’s desire to remove former Mayor Ed Koch’s name from the Queensboro Bridge has nothing to do with the AIDS crisis (“Zo wants to cancel Koch,” June 1).
Koch was a Jew, and that’s the only reason New York’s hater-in-chief wants to remove his name. Mamdani will be lucky if a sewer is named after him when he leaves office.
Barry Koppel
Kew Gardens Hills
I wasn’t a big fan of Ed Koch. However, removing his name from the 59th Street Bridge is simply “cancel culture” in another form.
In the early ’80s, very little was known about the AIDS virus. Judging individuals’ actions then by what we know now is neither appropriate nor fair.
Sean P. Kelly
Farmingdale
How disgraceful: These political virtue-signalers want to punish Ed Koch posthumously to settle their personal vendettas.
I could advocate the same for former Mayor David Dinkins over his poor direction during the Crown Heights riots, but it would be ugly to remove the name of New York’s first black mayor from the Municipal Building.
The tendencies among liberals to destroy history and memory rather than to enhance them is a major cause of the ignorance of voters who elect new batches of liberals.
Jeffrey Wiesenfeld
Great Neck
Want to weigh in on today’s stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
